What $100 would have done, by leverage
—
—
| Leverage | Held to now | Return | Worst point | Cost of the round trip | Outcome |
|---|
Every minute in the window is walked in order and the worst price inside each bar is tested against the liquidation level before the close, so a position that was liquidated mid-window stays liquidated even if the price later recovered. Opened on the ask and marked on the bid for a long, and the reverse for a short. Indicative example based on third-party market data. Moon's reference price, spread, fees, settlement and liquidation rules may produce a different result.
What a move would mean
0.00%My positions
| Bet | Wager | Leverage | Entry | Liquidation | Mark | Profit / Loss | Multiplier | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No open bets | ||||||||
Leveraged INTC over the last 6.5 hours: what it gained and what it lost
$86.83 up to $88.26 in 6.5 hours, +1.65%. Offers got cleared out. The long was the correct side and it still was not enough. 2x marks $102.31. 100x was liquidated after 49 minutes. Wrong side at 50x and $16.36 of the $100 is still there. Open, technically. 4 of 14 rungs did not finish the window. Last to go was 100x short, after 4.1 hours. 50x was the top rung left standing either way. None of that touches the 1% the round trip already took. INTC owes 0.01% to square it, roughly 0% of a normal session.
Leveraged trading of Intel Corporation (INTC): what has been happening
INTC marks $88.26. +0.90% today, -4.96% over five sessions. INTC is +2.27% on the month, so it arrives grinding higher. Three months reads -27.52%, year to date +124.12%. That is 2 closes in a row higher. The 30-session range is $81.79 to $107.57, which puts the last price -17.95% off the high and +7.91% off the low.
How volatile is INTC right now
Thirty sessions of realised volatility annualise to 72.3% and ninety to 90.3%, which puts INTC at a proper mover. Average true range across 14 sessions is 4.85% of price, and an ordinary day swings about 4.56% either side of flat. 8.75% is the worst it has been down from an open in 30 sessions, 11.97% in 90. Pick a multiplier that survives the bad one, not the average one.
What leverage INTC actually survives
10x is the highest rung that walked away from all 30 of the last sessions. It ends on a 10.000% move against you, and the worst INTC managed was 8.75%. Open the window to 90 sessions and it falls to 5x. INTC has gone 1.000% against an open-price long, which is where 100x ends, on 77 of the last 90 sessions. That is 86% of them. For 1000x the requirement is 0.1000%, met on 88 of 90 sessions. Per minute rather than per session: median bar 0.0663%, and 34.0% of them would close 1000x without any help from the rest of the day.
INTC liquidation distance and hit rate by leverage
| Leverage | Liquidation distance | Sessions it was hit | Hit rate | Round-trip cost vs stake |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2x | 50.0000% | 0 / 90 | 0% | 1.0% |
| 5x | 20.0000% | 0 / 90 | 0% | 1.0% |
| 10x | 10.0000% | 2 / 90 | 2% | 1.0% |
| 20x | 5.0000% | 22 / 90 | 24% | 1.0% |
| 50x | 2.0000% | 58 / 90 | 64% | 1.0% |
| 100x | 1.0000% | 77 / 90 | 86% | 1.0% |
| 200x | 0.5000% | 84 / 90 | 93% | 1.0% |
| 500x | 0.2000% | 87 / 90 | 97% | 1.0% |
| 1000x | 0.1000% | 88 / 90 | 98% | 1.0% |
Max loss distance is one part in the leverage, because Moon closes a wager once it has lost the wager and documents no maintenance buffer. Hit count is the number of the last 90 sessions where the low fell that far below the session open, i.e. where a long opened at the open would have reached its max loss price intraday. Cost is Moon's 1% opening fee, charged on the wager and not on the exposure, so it does not change down the ladder. A rolling fee applies every 8 hours at a rate Moon does not publish and is not included.
What a leveraged INTC position costs
The entry price is 1% of the wager. At 500x that is the same $1 per $100 it is at 5x, which is the only reason a four figure multiplier is affordable. Whatever rung you pick, 1% of the distance to the max loss price goes on the opening fee, and the remaining 99% is the actual trade. 4.9 times. That is how many times a normal INTC session covers the 1.00% a 100x wager has to spare. A rolling fee lands every 8 hours at a rate Moon shows in the platform and does not publish, so treat every number on this page as a 8 hour floor. At 1000x the max loss price is 0.100% from entry, which INTC can cover inside one minute bar.
INTC leverage questions
What leverage is realistic on INTC?
On the last 30 sessions of data the highest rung that avoided liquidation on every session was 10x, which liquidates on a 10.000% adverse move.
How far can INTC fall before a 100x long is liquidated?
1.000%. Moon closes the wager once it has lost the stake, and at 100x that is a one percent move, with no maintenance buffer ahead of it. INTC moved at least that far against an open-price long on 77 of the last 90 sessions.
What does it cost to open a wager on INTC?
1% of the wager. Moon charges the opening fee on the capital you commit and not on the leveraged exposure, so the figure does not change as the multiplier does. A position held past 8 hours also pays a rolling fee, at a rate Moon describes as dynamic and does not publish, so it is not modelled here.
How volatile is INTC right now?
30-session realised volatility annualises to 72.3% and 14-session average true range is 4.85% of price.
Does 1000x leverage make sense on INTC?
The fee does not settle it. Opening costs 1% of the wager at 1000x exactly as it does at 2x, so cost is not the objection. The stop is. Max loss sits 0.1000% from entry, which INTC can cover inside a single minute bar, and it did so on 88 of the last 90 sessions against an open-price long. Losses stop at the wager, so the question is not whether you can afford the fee. It is how long you expect to last.
What has Intel Corporation done recently?
+0.90% on the last session, -4.96% over five sessions, +2.27% over a month and +124.12% year to date, inside a 30-session range of $81.79 to $107.57.
Before you take this to Moon
Everything above is derived from independent third-party market data. Moon prices its own book: the reference price, the spread it quotes, its fee schedule, its funding rate and its liquidation engine are all Moon's, and they will produce a different number from this page. Use this as a model of the mechanics on INTC, then check the live figures on Moon before committing anything.
We have not verified that Moon lists INTC, so there is no link here. When someone checks, this becomes one. Moon does list equities at up to 1000x. What it costs and where it falls short.
What this simulator is
Prices come from Twelve Data, an independent market-data vendor, and are indicative. Moon's own reference price, spread, fee schedule, funding and liquidation rules will produce a different result. No money is staked here, no order is routed, and no position exists on any venue. At 1000× leverage a 0.01% difference between this chart and Moon's settlement feed moves the position value by roughly 10% of the stake, so treat every number below as an illustration of mechanics rather than a forecast of outcome.
Leverage arithmetic used
Exposure = stake × leverage. Long P/L = exposure × (mark − entry) ÷ entry. Short P/L = exposure × (entry − mark) ÷ entry. Entry takes the ask for a long and the bid for a short; closing does the reverse, so the spread is charged on the round trip. Liquidation triggers when equity falls to the maintenance margin, i.e. at an adverse move of (1 − leverage × maintenance rate) ÷ leverage.
Jurisdiction
Leverage caps, incentive bans and product classification differ by country. Retail CFD rules in the EU cap equity leverage far below the levels shown in this demo and restrict monetary incentives such as rakeback, so the referral block and the maximum selectable leverage must be gated per market before any page goes live. 18+. Trading leveraged products carries a high risk of losing your capital.